The summary problem
A tool that condenses a contract into three paragraphs has removed exactly the clauses that mattered. Compression is the opposite of review.
AUTOMATED LEGAL REVIEW
Automated review that still makes you read the findings.
Most automation ends at a summary nobody acts on. This runs three AI lawyers over the document, grades everything they find, and then refuses to finish until you've had an opinion about every item.
First contract free. No account needed, and your free upload is destroyed after analysis.
WHAT GOES WRONG
The three things that cost people most.
Not an exhaustive list — the recurring ones. Every finding comes back graded on the same five-step scale.
The single-reader problem
One model reading once produces one opinion, confidently. Nothing in the output tells you which parts of it are contested — because nothing contested them.
The report-nobody-reads problem
Output that arrives as a PDF gets skimmed and filed. The findings people skip are the ones that survive into the signed version.
WHAT IT READS
The documents this covers.
Sales & purchase contractsEmployment & consultingNDAs
Leases & rentalsSupplier & vendor agreementsService level agreements
…and most other commercial agreements.
WHAT YOU GET
Three things a summary can't give you.
Three passes, not one
One AI writes the findings; two more review those findings and argue with them, each comment pinned to the specific finding it answers. You see the disagreement.
One severity scale throughout
Every finding — risk, gap, number or deadline — comes back on the same five-step scale, so "critical" means the same thing wherever it appears.
A gate, not a report
Each finding gets triaged — ask to change it, fine by me, or not relevant — and you can make it explain itself or argue with it first. Submit stays locked until all of them have an answer, and the ones you push back on return as redlines.
And nothing gets past you unread: the report won't let you submit until every finding has an answer.
PRICING
Your first contract, free.
Then $29 for a single case, or from $39 a month. No account needed to start.
QUESTIONS
Frequently asked questions
How fast is automated legal review?
About five minutes for a typical contract, from upload to a full graded report. The document is read, its type, parties and governing law extracted, then analyzed by three AI reviewers in sequence. There is no page limit — a longer contract costs more credits rather than being refused.
What does automated legal review actually produce?
Seven kinds of finding: red flags, key points scored against market standard, missing clauses, financial impact, negotiation opportunities, a timeline of every date and obligation, and a readability score. Each one is graded, each one carries the reviewers' comments, and each one has to be triaged before you can submit.
Is automated review as reliable as a manual one?
It is consistent in a way manual review is not — it never gets tired, never skips a section, and applies the same scale to every document. It is also information rather than legal advice, and AI can be wrong. The honest framing is that it makes you a far better-prepared party, and for anything consequential you still take the findings to a qualified lawyer.
What file formats does it support?
PDF, Word, HTML and plain text everywhere. Scans, faxes and photographs are read by a vision model, on every plan including the free analysis, which covers up to 10 OCR pages. No account is required to run your first analysis.
Automate the reading. Keep the judgement.
Upload a contract and get a graded, triaged, redline-ready review in about five minutes.
First contract free · No account required · Not legal advice