FOR INDIVIDUALS

The contracts you sign alone are the ones nobody reads for you.

An employment offer, a tenancy agreement, an insurance policy, a settlement. Each one was drafted by someone with a lawyer, and handed to you without one. Upload it here and three AI lawyers read it from your side of the table.

First contract free. No account needed, and your free upload is destroyed after analysis.

WHAT GOES WRONG

The three things that cost people most.

Not an exhaustive list — the recurring ones. Every finding comes back graded on the same five-step scale.

Rights you didn't know you were giving away

IP assignment clauses that reach your personal projects. Non-competes that outlive the job. Consent buried in a paragraph about something else entirely.

Money you can't get back

Deposits with no return condition, fees that trigger on events you can't control, automatic renewals with a cancellation window that closed before you noticed it.

Deadlines nobody tells you about

Notice periods, probation windows, claim limits. Miss one and the right you had stops being a right — and there is no reminder.

WHAT YOU GET

Three things a summary can't give you.

It knows which side you're on

You tell it which party you are before it starts. Everything after that is written from your position — not a neutral summary of what the document says.

Plain English, on demand

Any finding you don't follow, you send back. It comes again in ordinary language, with why it matters to you specifically rather than in general.

Wording you can actually send

The findings you push back on come out as specific redline instructions you can copy into an email or the document itself.

And nothing gets past you unread: the report won't let you submit until every finding has an answer.

THE REVIEW LOOP

You answer every finding before you can move on.

Most contract tools hand you a report and consider the job done. This one won't let you leave until you've had an opinion about every single thing it found.

  • Ask to change this — push it through to the redline and get specific wording.
  • Fine by me — accept it, and it stops asking.
  • Not relevant — it does not apply to you. Counted separately from accepting, because one says the term is fine and the other says we were wrong.
  • Explain this — send it back and get it again in plain English, with why it matters to you.
  • Comment — tell it why it is wrong. It can rewrite its own finding, or reopen one you had dismissed; what it can never do is raise a new one in the middle of a review you had finished.
The review loop: one finding with the clause it quotes and a link back to it in the document, five ways to answer, and a progress bar that will not complete until every finding has been answered. Reviewed 9 / 12 CRITICAL Red flag § 8.2 1 of 5 Unlimited liability, uncapped Your exposure isn't limited to the fees you're paid. A market NDA caps it at 12 months' value. “…shall not be limited in amount or in time.” ↗ Show me where this is Ask to change this Fine by me Not relevant Explain this Comment 4 to change · 4 fine · 1 not relevant 3 findings still to review.

DRAFTING

And the document that does not exist yet.

Reading the document in front of you is one job. Writing the next one — a contract or a letter — is the other, and it is the same panel, pointed the other way: start from a blank page or from your own standard wording, a critic reads what came back for everything that is worse for you than it needed to be, and the drafter rewrites against those points.

  • Say what it is for, who the parties are and what you have already agreed — in your own words, or paste in your own standard wording if you already have it. There is no form to fill in.
  • A drafter writes the whole document — contract or letter — using your terms and the standard ones a lawyer would expect to find in it.
  • A critic reads it from the other side of the table and reports every place it gives away more than it had to.
  • The drafter rewrites against those points. A critique that fails leaves the draft exactly as written — nothing here can make the result worse than not running it.
  • What comes out is an ordinary document on the case. Run it through the same panel that reviews anything else, fix what it flags, and run it again until nothing's left to fix.
A draft in three stages: the brief in plain words, the clause the drafter wrote, the critic's objection to it, and the rewritten clause. YOUR BRIEF A consulting agreement. Six months, €4,500 a month. I keep the rights to what I make. They can end it early, but they pay for the notice. Drafter 9.1 Termination for convenience The Client may terminate on 30 days' written notice. Fees accrued to that date remain payable. Critic “Accrued to that date” pays for the work already done, not for the notice — which is what the brief asked for. Rewritten … and the Fees for the notice period in full.

THE REPORT, IN DETAIL

Seven kinds of finding, and what each one actually looks like.

Every analysis returns the same seven sections, graded on the same five-step scale, each carrying the reviewers' comments. Here is what comes back and a worked example of each.

01

Red flags

The clauses that put you at risk. Uncapped liability, indemnities that run one way, warranties you can't stand behind, automatic renewals with no exit, and consent buried where nobody reads. Each red flag names the clause, states the risk in your terms, and proposes what to ask for instead.

Graded low → critical
Critical§ 8.2 · Liability

Unlimited liability, uncapped

Your exposure isn't limited to the fees you're paid. A market position for this contract type caps it at 12 months' value.

AAden AI · Primary analyst

02

Key points

Your terms, set beside what the market usually does, with a deviation score wherever yours drift. It is the difference between "this clause is unusual" and "this clause is unusual, here is the standard version, and yours is 8 out of 10 away from it" — which is the sentence that changes a negotiation.

Deviation 0–10
DEVIATION 8/10§ 4.1 · Payment terms

Payment at 90 days, against a market 30

Your document: net 90 from invoice. Typical standard: net 30. That is 60 days of your working capital funding theirs.

AAden AI · Primary analyst

03

Missing clauses

What isn't in the document and should be. Absences are the hardest thing to notice when reading — there is nothing on the page to catch your eye — and they are frequently the most expensive thing about a contract. Each one comes with what its absence is likely to cost.

Graded low → critical
HighMissing · Limitation of liability

No liability cap anywhere in the document

Aden flagged § 8.2; I'd add that there is no cap clause at all, not merely a weak one. That is the gap to close first.

SSara AI · Second review

04

Financial impact

The clauses with a number behind them, and an estimate of what each is worth to you. Contracts hide money in notice periods, escalation formulas, service charges and termination fees — places where the figure is never actually written down. This is where it gets written down.

Estimated exposure
EST. $48,000§ 11.3 · Escalation

Annual uplift at CPI + 3%, uncapped

Over a five-year term at recent inflation, that compounds to roughly $48,000 above a flat CPI increase on the current base.

AAden AI · Primary analyst

05

Opportunities

Where you have leverage you didn't know about, and the specific angle for using it. This is the section that turns a list of complaints into a negotiating position — the trade you could offer, the clause worth conceding to win a better one, the ask they are likely to accept.

Graded low → critical
OPPORTUNITY§ 8.2 · Liability

Trade the cap for a longer term

They want a three-year commitment. A mutual 12-month cap is a cheap concession for them and the single most valuable thing you can win here.

LLiam AI · Third review

06

Timeline

Every date, deadline, notice period, renewal window and longstop in the document, pulled into one ordered list. These are the findings that hurt most, because missing one converts a right you paid for into nothing at all, silently and without a reminder.

Dated obligations
3 DATED OBLIGATIONS§ 14.1 · Renewal

Auto-renews unless cancelled 90 days out

Renewal date 31 March. Your notice window therefore closes 31 December — before most teams start reviewing next year's contracts.

AAden AI · Primary analyst

07

Readability

How hard the document is to read, scored out of ten, with the specific sentences making it harder than it needs to be. Unreadability is not a neutral property of legal drafting: a clause nobody can parse is a clause nobody argues with.

Scored 0–10
SCORE 4/10§ 6 · Definitions

One 94-word sentence with four nested conditions

Section 6.2 defines "Permitted Use" across four dependent clauses. Rewriting it as three sentences changes nothing legally and makes § 9 arguable.

AAden AI · Primary analyst

VERIFIED, NOT REMEMBERED

Grounded in the actual text of the law, not a model's memory of it.

A language model asked for a citation returns a plausible one — sometimes real, sometimes not, and it will not tell you which. Every citation and every regulatory precedent this product shows you has been looked up first.

1,840,980

sections of U.S. state and federal law

Every state's code but two — Georgia and North Carolina hold their own copyright over theirs — plus the U.S. Code, D.C. and Puerto Rico, refreshed every quarter. The same rule: a citation we cannot verify stays plain text, never a link.

82,099

provisions of Italian law, kept in force

The Codice civile, the Codice del Consumo and Italy's legislative decrees, refreshed from Normattiva. Every statute a review names is checked against this text before it is shown as a link — one we cannot verify is left as plain words instead.

45

EU laws — GDPR and more — in Italian, English and Spanish

1,650 articles from the acts an Italian or Spanish contract leans on most — the GDPR, the unfair-terms directive, consumer rights, Rome I — read in the current, amended text, never a repealed one, and in the reader's own language.

85

rulings by Italy's competition authority since 2013

432 clauses the Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato has already found unfair, or cleared. When a finding is about a clause of the same kind, we show you the ruling — quoted, dated and linked.

All four are checked against their source every time, never assumed. A citation that looks verified and isn't is worse than one we never made.

THE CATALOGUE

Twelve document types, and the clause that usually bites.

Not an exhaustive list of what it can read — it will analyze most commercial agreements — but these are the ones people bring most often.

Sales contracts

Goods and services agreements between businesses or with consumers, including one-off purchases and framework supply terms.

Watches for: delivery and acceptance risk, title and risk transfer, warranty scope, limitation of liability

Employment & consulting

Employment offers, contractor agreements and consulting terms, from either side of the table.

Watches for: IP assignment reach, non-competes, notice and probation, termination and garden leave

NDAs

Mutual and one-way non-disclosure agreements, including the ones stapled to a term sheet.

Watches for: definition of confidential information, term length, residuals clauses, permitted disclosures

Leases & rentals

Commercial and residential leases, licences to occupy, and short-term rental agreements.

Watches for: service charge caps, repair standard, break conditions, rent review mechanics, guarantees

Partnership & shareholder

Shareholder agreements, partnership deeds, founder agreements and joint venture terms.

Watches for: drag and tag rights, reserved matters, deadlock, vesting and leaver provisions

Family law documents

Separation, divorce and custody documents, and the financial agreements attached to them.

Watches for: asset and pension division, maintenance terms, review triggers, finality and disclosure

Supplier & vendor

Purchasing, procurement, distribution and reseller agreements on either side.

Watches for: payment terms, exclusivity, minimum commitments, price review, termination for convenience

Service level agreements

SLAs and support schedules, usually attached to a larger services contract.

Watches for: how uptime is measured, exclusions, service credits as sole remedy, escalation paths

Franchise & licensing

Franchise agreements, trademark and software licences, and reseller arrangements.

Watches for: territory and exclusivity, fee structure, quality control obligations, renewal and transfer

Loan & financing

Loan agreements, facility letters, guarantees, and equipment or invoice finance.

Watches for: true cost of borrowing, covenants, events of default, security and personal guarantees

Corporate contracts

Master service agreements, corporate services contracts and intra-group arrangements.

Watches for: order-of-precedence between documents, change control, audit rights, assignment on sale

Terms of service

Website and platform terms, subscription agreements and end-user licences.

Watches for: unilateral change rights, data and content licences, auto-renewal, liability exclusions

…and most other commercial agreements.

PRICING

Read the first one free. Then decide.

Your first contract is analyzed at no cost and without an account. After that, pay once for the one case you need to get right — or keep everything in one place on a subscription, with a monthly balance of credits to spend on whatever you sign next.

For you

You, your family, and the companies you run — on one subscription, not one per company.

Start here

First contract

One document, read and graded, before you pay anything.

Free

No card. No account.

No case library

Analyze a contract free

  • PDF, Word, HTML, plain text — and scans, up to 10 pages
  • A quick read — one AI lawyer, not the panel
  • Red flags, graded on the same five-step scale
  • Your document is destroyed as soon as it is read

One case

A lease, an offer, an NDA, a builder's quote — one thing you need to get right.

$29once

Everything on one case. No subscription.

1 case · 10 documents

Start with a free read

  • The full three-lawyer panel, not just a quick read
  • Redlines — the replacement wording, clause by clause
  • Drafting, not only review — the contract, the amendment or the letter, written and revised
  • Ask Legal AI — put a question to the document in plain language, and the answer stays with the case
  • Kept and encrypted, and credited against your first month if you subscribe

How credits work

Credits are what an analysis is charged in, and the charge is the real cost of the work. Nothing is capped and no document is turned away for being long — a longer contract simply costs more to read than a short one, and a panel of three costs more than a single reviewer.

  • Quick read One AI lawyer reads the contract end to end and writes the findings. The cheaper of the two, and often enough to tell whether a document needs the full panel.
  • Full panel The analyst writes the findings, then two more reviewers — running on other vendors' models — argue with them. This is the review the product is named for.
  • Run out? Top up any time, on any plan: $20 for 500 credits, or $100 for 2,500. Four cents a credit either way.
  • Monthly credits reset. The credits included with your plan expire at the end of each month and do not roll over. Topped-up credits never expire — they stay in your balance until you spend them.

Payments are handled by Stripe. Cancel any time. Every document in a case library is encrypted at rest. The refund policy is in the terms.

Buying for a company or a firm? See business pricing →

QUESTIONS

Frequently asked questions

Is AI contract review suitable for personal documents?

Yes, for understanding one. It is designed for exactly the situation where hiring a lawyer is out of proportion to the document — a job offer, a lease, an insurance policy — and reading it alone means missing things. It is information, not legal advice, and for anything with significant money or your livelihood attached you should still take it to a qualified lawyer. It is meant to make that conversation shorter and better informed.

How much does personal AI legal review cost?

The first contract is free — a quick read by one AI lawyer, with no card and no account. After that you can pay $29 once for the single case you need to get right, or take Household at $39 a month for 1,000 credits, topping up at four cents a credit whenever you need to. An analysis is charged at what it actually costs to run, so a short contract costs less than a long one and a quick read costs less than the full panel. Monthly credits reset each month; topped-up credits never expire.

What personal documents can your AI review?

Employment contracts and offers, tenancy and rental agreements, insurance policies, settlement agreements, freelance and consulting terms, loan and finance agreements, and most other contracts an individual is asked to sign. PDF, Word, HTML and plain text on every plan.

Is my personal information safe and private?

The document is deleted once it has been sent for analysis and is not retained afterwards. Guest case metadata is deleted after 15 days. There is a Destroy Case button on the report that removes everything immediately, and third-party models are used under a contractual commitment not to train on data sent through their APIs.

Read it properly before you sign it.

Upload the contract, tell us which side of it you're on, and have three lawyers argue about it for five minutes.

First contract free · No account required · Not legal advice