Associate hours on a first read
A junior spends an hour identifying what's actually unusual in a contract before anyone senior even opens it — billable time spent finding the starting point, not adding judgement.
FOR LAW FIRMS
Twenty minutes of associate time, not two hours.
A shared workspace, one matter per client, confidentiality that defaults to open and can be sealed on purpose. Upload a client's contract and the panel triages every clause before it reaches you — the first read is already done by the time you open the file.
First contract free. No account needed, and your free upload is destroyed after analysis.
WHAT GOES WRONG
The three things that cost people most.
Not an exhaustive list — the recurring ones. Every finding comes back graded on the same five-step scale.
A shared drive is not a confidentiality wall
Matters get sensitive without warning, and a folder permission set once at intake is not the same as a rule that's enforced every time someone opens a file.
No record of who touched what, or when
When a client asks what happened to their file, "I'll check with the team" is not an answer a firm wants to give.
WHAT YOU GET
Three things a summary can't give you.
Every clause triaged before you read it
Three AI reviewers read the contract from your client's side of the table first, citing the law behind each finding. What reaches you is a graded list, not a blank page.
One matter, one shared record
Documents, the timeline, the money terms and the conversation all hang off the case — visible to everyone on the matter, sealed from everyone who isn't.
An audit trail your client can ask about
Who looked at what, and when. Team Pro keeps the record, so "I'll check with the team" is never the answer.
And nothing gets past you unread: the report won't let you submit until every finding has an answer.
THE REVIEW LOOP
You answer every finding before you can move on.
Most contract tools hand you a report and consider the job done. This one won't let you leave until you've had an opinion about every single thing it found.
- Ask to change this — push it through to the redline and get specific wording.
- Fine by me — accept it, and it stops asking.
- Not relevant — it does not apply to you. Counted separately from accepting, because one says the term is fine and the other says we were wrong.
- Explain this — send it back and get it again in plain English, with why it matters to you.
- Comment — tell it why it is wrong. It can rewrite its own finding, or reopen one you had dismissed; what it can never do is raise a new one in the middle of a review you had finished.
DRAFTING
And the document that does not exist yet.
Reading the document in front of you is one job. Writing the next one — a contract or a letter — is the other, and it is the same panel, pointed the other way: start from a blank page or from your own standard wording, a critic reads what came back for everything that is worse for you than it needed to be, and the drafter rewrites against those points.
- Say what it is for, who the parties are and what you have already agreed — in your own words, or paste in your own standard wording if you already have it. There is no form to fill in.
- A drafter writes the whole document — contract or letter — using your terms and the standard ones a lawyer would expect to find in it.
- A critic reads it from the other side of the table and reports every place it gives away more than it had to.
- The drafter rewrites against those points. A critique that fails leaves the draft exactly as written — nothing here can make the result worse than not running it.
- What comes out is an ordinary document on the case. Run it through the same panel that reviews anything else, fix what it flags, and run it again until nothing's left to fix.
THE REPORT, IN DETAIL
Seven kinds of finding, and what each one actually looks like.
Every analysis returns the same seven sections, graded on the same five-step scale, each carrying the reviewers' comments. Here is what comes back and a worked example of each.
01
Red flags
The clauses that put you at risk. Uncapped liability, indemnities that run one way, warranties you can't stand behind, automatic renewals with no exit, and consent buried where nobody reads. Each red flag names the clause, states the risk in your terms, and proposes what to ask for instead.
Graded low → criticalCritical§ 8.2 · Liability
Unlimited liability, uncapped
Your exposure isn't limited to the fees you're paid. A market position for this contract type caps it at 12 months' value.
AAden AI · Primary analyst
02
Key points
Your terms, set beside what the market usually does, with a deviation score wherever yours drift. It is the difference between "this clause is unusual" and "this clause is unusual, here is the standard version, and yours is 8 out of 10 away from it" — which is the sentence that changes a negotiation.
Deviation 0–10DEVIATION 8/10§ 4.1 · Payment terms
Payment at 90 days, against a market 30
Your document: net 90 from invoice. Typical standard: net 30. That is 60 days of your working capital funding theirs.
AAden AI · Primary analyst
03
Missing clauses
What isn't in the document and should be. Absences are the hardest thing to notice when reading — there is nothing on the page to catch your eye — and they are frequently the most expensive thing about a contract. Each one comes with what its absence is likely to cost.
Graded low → criticalHighMissing · Limitation of liability
No liability cap anywhere in the document
Aden flagged § 8.2; I'd add that there is no cap clause at all, not merely a weak one. That is the gap to close first.
SSara AI · Second review
04
Financial impact
The clauses with a number behind them, and an estimate of what each is worth to you. Contracts hide money in notice periods, escalation formulas, service charges and termination fees — places where the figure is never actually written down. This is where it gets written down.
Estimated exposureEST. $48,000§ 11.3 · Escalation
Annual uplift at CPI + 3%, uncapped
Over a five-year term at recent inflation, that compounds to roughly $48,000 above a flat CPI increase on the current base.
AAden AI · Primary analyst
05
Opportunities
Where you have leverage you didn't know about, and the specific angle for using it. This is the section that turns a list of complaints into a negotiating position — the trade you could offer, the clause worth conceding to win a better one, the ask they are likely to accept.
Graded low → criticalOPPORTUNITY§ 8.2 · Liability
Trade the cap for a longer term
They want a three-year commitment. A mutual 12-month cap is a cheap concession for them and the single most valuable thing you can win here.
LLiam AI · Third review
06
Timeline
Every date, deadline, notice period, renewal window and longstop in the document, pulled into one ordered list. These are the findings that hurt most, because missing one converts a right you paid for into nothing at all, silently and without a reminder.
Dated obligations3 DATED OBLIGATIONS§ 14.1 · Renewal
Auto-renews unless cancelled 90 days out
Renewal date 31 March. Your notice window therefore closes 31 December — before most teams start reviewing next year's contracts.
AAden AI · Primary analyst
07
Readability
How hard the document is to read, scored out of ten, with the specific sentences making it harder than it needs to be. Unreadability is not a neutral property of legal drafting: a clause nobody can parse is a clause nobody argues with.
Scored 0–10SCORE 4/10§ 6 · Definitions
One 94-word sentence with four nested conditions
Section 6.2 defines "Permitted Use" across four dependent clauses. Rewriting it as three sentences changes nothing legally and makes § 9 arguable.
AAden AI · Primary analyst
VERIFIED, NOT REMEMBERED
Grounded in the actual text of the law, not a model's memory of it.
A language model asked for a citation returns a plausible one — sometimes real, sometimes not, and it will not tell you which. Every citation and every regulatory precedent this product shows you has been looked up first.
1,840,980
sections of U.S. state and federal law
Every state's code but two — Georgia and North Carolina hold their own copyright over theirs — plus the U.S. Code, D.C. and Puerto Rico, refreshed every quarter. The same rule: a citation we cannot verify stays plain text, never a link.
82,099
provisions of Italian law, kept in force
The Codice civile, the Codice del Consumo and Italy's legislative decrees, refreshed from Normattiva. Every statute a review names is checked against this text before it is shown as a link — one we cannot verify is left as plain words instead.
45
EU laws — GDPR and more — in Italian, English and Spanish
1,650 articles from the acts an Italian or Spanish contract leans on most — the GDPR, the unfair-terms directive, consumer rights, Rome I — read in the current, amended text, never a repealed one, and in the reader's own language.
85
rulings by Italy's competition authority since 2013
432 clauses the Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato has already found unfair, or cleared. When a finding is about a clause of the same kind, we show you the ruling — quoted, dated and linked.
All four are checked against their source every time, never assumed. A citation that looks verified and isn't is worse than one we never made.
THE CATALOGUE
Twelve document types, and the clause that usually bites.
Not an exhaustive list of what it can read — it will analyze most commercial agreements — but these are the ones people bring most often.
Sales contracts
Goods and services agreements between businesses or with consumers, including one-off purchases and framework supply terms.
Watches for: delivery and acceptance risk, title and risk transfer, warranty scope, limitation of liability
Employment & consulting
Employment offers, contractor agreements and consulting terms, from either side of the table.
Watches for: IP assignment reach, non-competes, notice and probation, termination and garden leave
NDAs
Mutual and one-way non-disclosure agreements, including the ones stapled to a term sheet.
Watches for: definition of confidential information, term length, residuals clauses, permitted disclosures
Leases & rentals
Commercial and residential leases, licences to occupy, and short-term rental agreements.
Watches for: service charge caps, repair standard, break conditions, rent review mechanics, guarantees
Partnership & shareholder
Shareholder agreements, partnership deeds, founder agreements and joint venture terms.
Watches for: drag and tag rights, reserved matters, deadlock, vesting and leaver provisions
Family law documents
Separation, divorce and custody documents, and the financial agreements attached to them.
Watches for: asset and pension division, maintenance terms, review triggers, finality and disclosure
Supplier & vendor
Purchasing, procurement, distribution and reseller agreements on either side.
Watches for: payment terms, exclusivity, minimum commitments, price review, termination for convenience
Service level agreements
SLAs and support schedules, usually attached to a larger services contract.
Watches for: how uptime is measured, exclusions, service credits as sole remedy, escalation paths
Franchise & licensing
Franchise agreements, trademark and software licences, and reseller arrangements.
Watches for: territory and exclusivity, fee structure, quality control obligations, renewal and transfer
Loan & financing
Loan agreements, facility letters, guarantees, and equipment or invoice finance.
Watches for: true cost of borrowing, covenants, events of default, security and personal guarantees
Corporate contracts
Master service agreements, corporate services contracts and intra-group arrangements.
Watches for: order-of-precedence between documents, change control, audit rights, assignment on sale
Terms of service
Website and platform terms, subscription agreements and end-user licences.
Watches for: unilateral change rights, data and content licences, auto-renewal, liability exclusions
…and most other commercial agreements.
PRICING
Read the first one free. Then decide.
Your first contract is analyzed at no cost and without an account. After that it runs on credits — a monthly balance the whole workspace draws on, spent at what each analysis actually costs to run.
For your firm
Priced per seat, but the credits and the case library belong to the workspace: five seats on Team is 5,000 credits the whole firm draws on, not 1,000 stranded on each person.
Team
A small firm where more than one person reads the contracts.
$49/ user / month $490/ user / year
1,000 credits per seat, pooled
30 active cases · 500 documents
- The full three-lawyer panel on every contract, not just a quick read
- Redlines — the replacement wording, clause by clause
- Drafting, not only review — the contract, the amendment or the letter, written and revised
- Ask Legal AI — put a question to a document in plain language, and the answer stays with the case
- Redlines back as a Word .docx, or written straight into your Google Doc
- Everyone in the firm on one workspace, sharing one encrypted case library
- Confidentiality down to the single document, and roles for who may do what
- Contracts arrive by email, straight onto the right case
Team Pro
A practice with contracts arriving faster than anyone can read them.
$99/ user / month $990/ user / year
2,500 credits per seat, pooled
100 active cases · 1,000 documents
- Everything in Team
- Two and a half times the credits
- Three times the active cases, and twice the documents
- A full access trail — every change to who could see what, and when
- Priority queue and a support response time
Team Ultimate
Firms with their own compliance obligations to answer for.
$199/ user / month $1,990/ user / year
6,000 credits per seat, pooled
Unlimited cases and documents
- Everything in Team Pro
- More than twice the credits again
- Retention and data-residency controls
- A BAA on request, for firms handling health data
A business starts where everybody starts: one contract read and graded, free, with no account. Analyze a contract free
How credits work
Credits are what an analysis is charged in, and the charge is the real cost of the work. Nothing is capped and no document is turned away for being long — a longer contract simply costs more to read than a short one, and a panel of three costs more than a single reviewer.
- Quick read One AI lawyer reads the contract end to end and writes the findings. The cheaper of the two, and often enough to tell whether a document needs the full panel.
- Full panel The analyst writes the findings, then two more reviewers — running on other vendors' models — argue with them. This is the review the product is named for.
- Run out? Top up any time, on any plan: $20 for 500 credits, or $100 for 2,500. Four cents a credit either way.
- Monthly credits reset. The credits included with your plan expire at the end of each month and do not roll over. Topped-up credits never expire — they stay in your balance until you spend them.
Payments are handled by Stripe. Cancel any time. Every document in a case library is encrypted at rest. The refund policy is in the terms.
QUESTIONS
Frequently asked questions
Does this replace an associate's judgement?
No. It triages the contract before a person reads it — every finding cites the clause and the law behind it, and a person still decides what matters.
Can I keep a matter confidential from the rest of the firm?
Yes. A matter defaults to open across the firm's workspace, and can be marked restricted to the people you actually name — an ethical wall you set on purpose, not one you forgot to set.
Do the credits belong to me or to the firm?
The firm's. Every seat on a plan draws from one shared balance and one case library, not a stranded allowance per person.
What if I need a second opinion outside the firm?
That's not what this replaces — it's what gets a contract ready for the associate or partner who signs off on it, faster.
Twenty minutes, not two hours.
Try it on one client's contract, free, before you put a seat on it.
First contract free · No account required · Not legal advice